|
Introduction: The Story Behind the Book |
1 |
|
Meeting with the US-based Sringeri leader and one of the major donors |
9 |
|
Meeting with Sheldon Pollock |
13 |
|
Trip to Sringeri Sharada Peetham |
17 |
|
Who will control our traditions? |
19 |
|
What is at stake? |
21 |
|
Assault on Sanskrit goes mainstream |
26 |
1. |
The Hijacking of Sanskrit and Sanskriti |
29 |
|
Why this book matters? |
29 |
|
Highlighting the disputes between the two intellectual camps |
35 |
|
Where is the Home Team? |
43 |
|
Offering my humble attempts |
48 |
2. |
From European Orientalism to American Orientalism |
50 |
|
Origins of Orientalism |
51 |
|
The rise of European Orientalism |
54 |
|
Sir William Jones, the European Orientalist |
55 |
|
The American frontier |
61 |
|
The rise of American Orientalism |
68 |
|
Comparing European Orientalism and American Orientalism |
74 |
|
Impact of American Orientalism on the study of Sanskrit |
75 |
|
Introducing Sheldon Pollock: Pandit from America |
78 |
|
Comparing two pioneering Orientalists: Sir William Jones and Sheldon Pollock |
94 |
3. |
The Obsession with Secularizing Sanskrit |
96 |
|
Integral unity of Hindu metaphysics |
98 |
|
Discarding the transcendent/sacred aspects of Sanskrit |
102 |
|
Sidelining the oral tradition |
105 |
|
Accusing yajnas of being linked to social hierarchy |
113 |
|
Rejecting the shastras as Vedic dogma |
114 |
|
Using Buddhism as a wedge for secularizing Sanskrit |
125 |
|
Disconnecting kavya from Vedas and shastras |
129 |
4. |
Sanskrit Considered a Source of Oppression |
135 |
|
The crisis of Indology and a novel solution |
135 |
|
Exposing Sanskrit’s ‘poisons’ |
144 |
|
Response: Debating varna |
146 |
|
Blaming Sanskrit for European atrocities |
167 |
|
Pollock’s call to action to politicize Sanskrit studies |
173 |
5. |
Ramayana Framed as Socially Irresponsible |
179 |
|
Pollock’s view of Ramayana as a project for propagating Vedic social oppression |
179 |
|
The divinization construct |
182 |
|
The demonization construct |
188 |
|
Sociological criticism of the Ramayana |
189 |
|
Claiming Ramayana was popularized to demonize Muslims since the eleventh century |
192 |
|
Ramayana considered secular |
196 |
|
Claiming Valmiki Ramayana came after Buddhist influence |
196 |
|
Summary: Ramayana interpreted as atrocity literature |
197 |
|
Ramayana-based political action plan of intervening in Indian politics |
199 |
6. |
Politicizing Indian Literature |
202 |
|
A dramatic break from earlier Orientalism |
204 |
|
Sacredness removed from rasa and kavya |
206 |
|
The theory of the aestheticization of power |
210 |
|
Kavya characterized as primarily political |
217 |
|
|
|
7. |
Politicizing the History of Sanskrit and the Vernaculars |
222 |
|
Overview of Pollock’s account of history of how power shaped languages |
222 |
|
Introducing the ‘Sanskrit Cosmopolis’ and sidelining sanskriti |
226 |
|
Grammar as a form of political power |
234 |
|
The role of itihasas in spreading the Sanskrit cosmopolis |
238 |
|
Summary of issues with the grammar-itihasa power theory |
241 |
|
The rise of the vernaculars |
243 |
|
What led so many kings to vernacularize? |
250 |
|
Claiming parallels between European and Indian vernacularization |
253 |
8. |
The Sanskriti Web as an Alternative Hypothesis |
256 |
|
Diglossia versus hyperglossia models |
262 |
|
Approaches suggested by T.S. Satyanath |
265 |
|
Integral unity, open architecture and sanskriti web |
270 |
9. |
Declaring Sanskrit Dead and Sanskriti Non-existent |
273 |
|
Agenda in declaring the death of Sanskrit |
273 |
|
Claiming Sanskrit has been dead for many centuries |
276 |
|
Claiming Hindu kings killed Sanskrit, and Muslim rulers tried to save it |
280 |
|
Accusing other Indian languages of killing Sanskrit |
286 |
|
Sparing British colonialism and Nehruvianism |
286 |
|
Silence on the extraction and digestion of Sanskrit shastras into the West |
293 |
|
Chamu Krishna Shastry responds on behalf of the tradition |
294 |
|
Western academic critiques of Pollock |
300 |
|
The history of attempts to ‘kill’ Sanskrit |
304 |
|
Rejecting Indian civilization and Indian nation |
307 |
10. |
Is Sheldon Pollock Too Big to Be Criticized? |
314 |
|
Two goals |
315 |
|
The academic ecosystem |
317 |
|
The hegemonic discourse goes mainstream |
327 |
|
Third-party echoes: Pollock’s ideas go viral |
337 |
|
The re-colonization of Indian minds |
341 |
|
The Murty Classical Library of India |
345 |
|
The rise of the American-English cosmopolis |
348 |
|
Reversing the gaze: Interpreting Pollock using his own concepts |
351 |
11. |
Conclusion: The Way Forward |
356 |
|
The Sanskrit ecosystem must be revived in a holistic way |
357 |
|
Non-translatable Sanskrit terms must enter the mainstream |
358 |
|
Shastras must be seen as a platform for innovation |
359 |
|
New itihasas and smritis must be written |
360 |
|
‘Sacred philology’ must compete against political/liberation philology |
362 |
|
The purva-paksha tradition must be revived |
364 |
|
Well-qualified home team and institutions must be developed |
372 |
|
Defining the hard work that is needed |
373 |
|
Appendix A: Pollock’s Theory of Buddhist Undermining of the Vedas |
381 |
|
Appendix B: Ramayana Evidence Prior to the Turkish Invasion |
392 |
|
Appendix C: Pollock’s Political Activism |
397 |
|
Appendix D: Acknowledgements |
400 |
|
Appendix E: Editorial Policies Adopted |
403 |
|
Notes |
405 |
|
Bibliography |
455 |
|
Index |
463 |